logoJackobian
  • Home
  • Materials
  • Authors
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Materials
  • Authors
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Become an Author

  • Login
Become an Author


logo
  • Socials
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Resources
  • Materials
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Contact us
  • Legal
  • Terms & Condition
  • Privacy policy
google play

Get it on
Google Play

Download on the
App Store


© Jackobian 2026

BUILT BYCerebrohives
BooksUNNECO 512

In-App Reading Experiences

All books bought on the website can only be read on the app. Download Jackobian to have access to your materials

Analysis of Poverty Correlates and Multi‐Dimensionality in South East Nigeria: New Empirical Evidence From Survey Data

ECO 512: ANALYSIS OF POVERTY CORRELATES AND MULTI‐DIMENSIONALITY IN SOUTH EAST NIGERIA: NEW EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SURVEY DATA

ByAnthony Orji
SchoolUniversity of Nigeria, Nsukka
DepartmentEconomics
CategoryAcademic JournalsResearch Papers
Levels100200300400500600Post Graduate
₦ 3000
Preview Book

Description

Using data from the Generalized Households’ Survey (GHS), this article analyzed the incidence of

multi‐dimensional poverty and its determinants in South East Nigeria. Adopting the Alkire‐Foster

methodology and the logit model, the study found that the significant predictors of poverty and

deprivation across dimensions include income (less than minimum wage), education, and con-

sumption. The result showed that based on per capita consumption expenditure, over 60 percent of the

South East population are living below the used $1.25/day. The pattern of group‐specific poverty

headcounts showed that those without formal education are poorer than those with formal education.

Seventy percent of those residents in the rural areas were found to be poor as compared with 30

percent poverty level found in the urban areas. Male‐headed households were found to be far poorer

than female‐headed households based on poverty headcounts; however, in terms of multi‐dimensional

poverty headcounts, female‐headed households are more deprived than the male‐headed households.

The result also showed that the multi‐dimensional poverty is exacerbated by being a female‐headed

household, living in rural areas with large household size. All of these were found to increase the

possibility of being multi‐dimensionally poor. The result also showed that a household with electricity

reduces the incidence of multi‐dimensional poverty. The study, therefore, recommended that the

government should pay closer attention to female‐headed households and the rural areas by providing

the basic amenities to ameliorate their socio‐economic plights. Since the availability of electricity and

other infrastructure reduces poverty incidence, it is expedient for the government to make power

(electricity) provision and other infrastructure, a major priority.